Keyword

Abstract

With the proliferation of post-Cold War globalisation, the international community began to appreciate the immense importance of maritime security. In recent decades, numerous national, regional, and global information sharing centres have been established with an aim to provide relevant stakeholders with an assessment of the risks and threats within the maritime domain. Unfortunately, international organisations failed to simultaneously emphasise the importance of standardised terminology and definitions for use in the global maritime security context.

Instead of using other standardised areas of the maritime industry such as maritime safety as a guide, dozens of government agencies, regional reporting centres, private maritime security companies, and information sharing/fusion centres have now been established. Each of these uses its own unique categories, terminology, and definitions to measure and catalogue regional and global incidents of violent maritime crime. In this article, that includes acts of piracy and armed robbery against ships. In some cases, political and economic bias has played a significant role in how maritime security incident data is officially recorded and presented to the public. This lack of data cohesion has resulted in significant confusion and distrust amongst the shipping industry and policymakers. It has also created an uncertain environment for seafarers, who largely depend on their employers and regulators to keep them safe and secure at sea.

The research includes an analysis of several sets of qualitative and quantitative data from prominent agencies and reporting centres. Case studies are also presented to illustrate why harmonised terminology, definitions, and incident reporting protocols are integral to achieving global maritime domain awareness. The numerous challenges to achieving this goal are then explored and proposed solutions are presented. The paper concludes by proposing a lexicon for incidents of violent maritime crime, as a first step in creating a common lexicon for global maritime security. As stated in earlier issues, this journal does not seek to promote a common definition of maritime security, but a common lexicon is of more practical use.

This article is based on a dissertation completed as part of the master’s degree in Maritime Security at Coventry University in 2022.


Download Full Text Here

References
  • Ahmmed, R. (2018). The Approaches of Teaching and Learning Maritime English: Some Factors to Consider. . Bangladesh Maritime Journal, September. http://www.bsmrmu.edu.bd/journal-bmj/assets/pdf/vol-2-issue-1/bmj-02-01-08.pdf
  • Aminah, & Refnaldi. (2020). Students’ Needs on Maritime English Learning Material: A Case at Vocational High Schools. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 411(Icoelt 2019), 242–249. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200306.041
  • Andreas, P., & Greenhill, K. M. (2010). The Politics of Numbers in Global Crime and Conflict. Cornell University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctt7zg8b.15
  • Astratinei, C. (2016). Communication Problems in a Mixed Crew Environment. Scientific Bulletin of Naval Academy, 19(1), 13–16. https://doi.org/10.21279/1454-864x-16-i1-002
  • Bateman, S. (2007). UNCLOS and its limitations as the foundation for a regional maritime security regime. Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 19(3), 27–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/10163270709464140
  • Bellamy, C. (2020). What are maritime crime and maritime security? International Journal of Maritime Crime and Security, 01(01), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.24052/ijmcs/v01is01/art-2
  • BIMCO, ICS, IFSMA, IGP&I, INTERTANKO, INTERCARGO, & OCIMF. (2018). Global counter piracy guidance for companies, masters and seafarers (1st ed.). Witherby’s.
  • BIMCO, ICS, IGP&I, INTERTANKO, & OCIMF. (2018). Best Management Practices to Deter Piracy and Enhance Maritime Security in the Red Sea, Gulf of Aden, Indian Ocean and Arabian Sea (BMP5) (5th ed.). Witherby’s. https://www.maritimeglobalsecurity.org/media/1037/bmp5-low_res.pdf
  • Bueger, C. (2015a). From dusk to dawn? Maritime domain awareness in Southeast Asia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 37(2), 157–182. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs37-2a
  • Bueger, C. (2015b). What is Maritime Security? Marine Policy, 53, 159–164.
  • https://reader.elsevier.com/reader/sd/pii/S0308597X14003327?token=1011A5FC48F2DD5D5282B9BF641342ED1EB4C4A65CEA0B080E1E1E246EEEF7950F6E20E9CDE12890F4E9F443F5FDC75B&originRegion=us-east-1&originCreation=20211126005221
  • Bueger, C. (2021). Does Maritime Security Require a New United Nations Structure? IPI Global Observatory. https://theglobalobservatory.org/2021/08/does-maritime-security-require-a-new-united-nations-structure/
  • Bueger, C., & Edmunds, T. (2017). Beyond seablindness: A new agenda for maritime security studies. International Affairs, 93(6), 1293–1311. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix174
  • Bueger, C., & Edmunds, T. (2020). Blue crime: Conceptualising transnational organised crime at sea. Marine Policy, 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104067
  • Bueger, C., & Edmunds, T. (2021). Pragmatic ordering: Informality, experimentation, and the maritime security agenda. Review of International Studies, 47(2), 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210520000479
  • Bueger, C., Edmunds, T., & McCabe, R. (2020). Into the sea: capacity-building innovations and the maritime security challenge. Third World Quarterly, 41(2), 228–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2019.1660632
  • Chambers, S. (2020, August 3). Details emerge of how a disgruntled armed guard took control of an Eagle Bulk supramax for three days. Splash247. https://splash247.com/details-emerge-of-how-a-disgruntled-armed-guard-took-control-of-an-eagle-bulk-supramax-for-three-days/
  • Chapsos, I. (2016). Is maritime security a traditional security challenge? In Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications (pp. 59–78). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27914-5_4
  • Churchill, R. (2012). Compliance mechanisms in the Law of the Sea: from the individual to the collective. In Holger P. Hestermeyer; Doris Konig; Nele Matz-Luck; Volker Roben; Anja Seibert-Fohr; Peter Tobias Stoll; Silja Voneky (Ed.), Coexistence, cooperation and solidarity: Liber Amicorum Rüdiger Wolfrum (pp. 777–806). Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Cook, P. (2020). Comment: The emerging spectrum of maritime security. International Journal of Maritime Crime and Security, 01(01), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.24052/ijmcs/v01is01/art-5
  • Curt, E., Huggins, J., & Pegg, R. (2020). IMO Working Group to Harmonize Definitions and Reporting. Shared Awareness and Deconfliction (SHADE) 47.
  • Deves, K., & Post, W. (2013). Maritime Piracy Incident Reporting A Technical Feasibility Study Application of the ECCAIRS Reporting System into the domain of maritime piracy. https://doi.org/10.2788/82759
  • Dirgeyasa, I. W. (2018). The Need Analysis of Maritime English Learning Materials for Nautical Students of Maritime Academy in Indonesia Based on STCW’2010 Curriculum. English Language Teaching, 11(9), 41. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n9p41
  • EU NAVFOR ATALANTA. (2022). Understanding Evolving Threats in the Western Indian Ocean and the Gulf of Aden Operations. Djibouti Code of Conduct - Jeddah Agreement High-Level Meeting.
  • European Commission. (2014). EU Maritime Security Strategy.
  • Fan, L., Fei, J., Schriever, U., & Fan, S. (2017). The communicative competence of Chinese seafarers and their employability in the international maritime labour market. Marine Policy, 83(May), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.05.035
  • Flynn, B. (2022). Non-state and Hybrid Actorness at Sea: From Narco-Subs to Drone Patrols. Routledge Handbook of Maritime Security, 287–298. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003001324-27
  • Franceschi, D. (2014). The Features of Maritime English Discourse. International Journal of English Linguistics, 4(2), 78–87. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v4n2p78
  • Fransas, A., Nieminen, E., Salokorpi, M., & Rytkönen, J. (2021). Maritime safety and security. In Maritime safety and security: Literature Review. Kymenlaakso University of Applied Sciences. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367822729-5
  • García Pérez, R. (2022). THE LIBERAL APPROACH TO MARITIME SECURITY. In Routledge Handbook of Maritime Security (pp. 62–72). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003001324-7
  • Germond, B. (2015). Geopolitics of Seapower. In The Maritime Dimension of European Security: Seapower and the European Union (pp. 19–32). http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/coventry/detail.action?docID=4000732.
  • Gesami, B. (2021). MARITIME SECURITY THREATS IN AFRICA. Academia Letters, Sep 2021, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL3564
  • Goward, D. A. (2008). Maritime Domain Awareness: The key to maritime security. Center for Oceans Law and Policy, 12(April 2007), 513–525. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004164277.v-594.75
  • Hawkes, K. G. (1989). Maritime Security. Cornell Maritime Press.
  • Huggins, J., & Vestergaard Madsen, J. (2014). The CGPCS: the evolution of multilateralism to multi-stakeholder collaboration. Fighting Piracy off the Coast of Somalia. Lessons Learned from the Contact Group, 18–27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/resrep07079.6.pdf
  • ICC-GoG. (2022). ICC-GoG quarterly report on maritime safety and security in the Gulf of Guinea (Issue Edition/N°01/2022). www.icc-gog.org
  • ICC-IMB. (2020). ICC-IMB Piracy and Armed Robbery Against Ships Report 2020 (Issue April).
  • ICC IMB-PRC. (2021). ICC International Maritime Bureau - Piracy and Armed Robbery Againt Ships - Annual Report 2021.
  • IFC-IOR. (2022). IFC-IOR Annual Report 2021. In A. Dhiman, P. A. Varma, C. Parks, & D. Kanjiraparambil (Eds.), Information Fusion Centre - Indian Ocean Region.
  • IMO. (2013). IMO What it is. In IMO - What it is (p. 72). International Maritime Organization. https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/About/Documents/What it is Oct 2013_Web.pdf
  • IMO Assembly. (2002). IMO STANDARD MARINE COMMUNICATION PHRASES. In Resolution A.918(22): Vol. A 22/Res.9 (Issue January).
  • IMO Assembly. (2008). Adoption of the code of the international standards and recommended practices for a safety investigation into a marine casualty or marine incident (Casualty Investigation Code). IMO Resolution MSC.255(84).
  • IMO Assembly. (2010). Resolution A.1025(26) - CODE OF PRACTICE FOR THE INVESTIGATION OF CRIMES OF PIRACY AND ARMED ROBBERY AGAINST SHIPS. CODE OF PRACTICE FOR THE INVESTIGATION OF CRIMES OF PIRACY AND ARMED ROBBERY AGAINST SHIPS, 1–8.
  • IMO MSC. (1986). MEASURES TO PREVENT UNLAWFUL ACTS AGAINST PASSENGERS AND CREWS ON BOARD SHIPS. MSC/Circ.443. https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/OurWork/Security/Documents/MSC.Circ.443.pdf
  • IMO MSC. (2009). GUIDANCE TO SHIPOWNERS, COMPANIES, SHIP OPERATORS, SHIPMASTERS AND CREWS ON PREVENTING AND SUPPRESSING ACTS OF PIRACY AND ARMED ROBBERY AGAINST SHIPS. MSC.1/Circ.1334.
  • IMO MSC. (2015). RECOMMENDATIONS TO GOVERNMENTS FOR PREVENTING AND SUPPRESSING PIRACY AND ARMED ROBBERY AGAINST SHIPS. MSC.1/Circ.1333/Rev.1.
  • IMO MSC. (2019). Report of the Maritime Safety Committee on its 101st Session. 103.
  • International Maritime Organization (IMO). (2019). Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Fixed Platforms Located on the Continental Shelf. Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Fixed Platforms Located on the Continental Shelf. https://www.imo.org/en/About/Conventions/Pages/SUA-Treaties.aspx
  • International Maritime Organization (IMO). (2022). MSC.4/Circ.266 - REPORTS ON ACTS OF PIRACY AND ARMED ROBBERY AGAINST SHIPS. In Maritime Security and Piracy (Issue April).
  • Jacobsen, K. L. (2019). Poly-criminal Pirates and Ballooning Effects: Implications for International Counter-piracy. Global Policy, 10(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12636
  • Jacobsen, K. L. (2022). THE POLITICS OF PIRACY NUMBERS: THE GULF OF GUINEA CASE. In Routledge Handbook of Maritime Security (1st ed., pp. 127–138). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003001324-13
  • Klein, N. (2011a). International Law of Maritime Security: A Synopsis and Proposal for Change. Maritime Security and the Law of the Sea, 301–328. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199566532.003.0007
  • Klein, N. (2011b). Two Fundamental Concepts. In Maritime Security and the Law of the Sea (pp. 1–23). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199566532.003.0001
  • Lombardo, N. D. (2014). Underreporting Of Crimes At Sea Reasons, Consequences, And Potential Solutions (Issue November). http://oceansbeyondpiracy.org/sites/default/files/attachments/Underreporting.pdf
  • Lutz, F., Roel, D. P., & D. Thiele, R. (2013). Maritime Security – Perspectives for a Comprehensive Approach. ISPSW Strategy Series: Focus on Defense and International Security, 49(222), 1–25.
  • Maritime Domain Awareness for Trade - Gulf of Guinea. (2021a). Biannual Report 2021 part 1 (Issue December). https://gog-mdat.org/reports
  • Maritime Domain Awareness for Trade - Gulf of Guinea. (2021b). Biannual Report 2021 part 2 (Issue December). https://gog-mdat.org/reports
  • Marshall Islands. (2022). Ship Security Advisory 05-22. Republic of the Marshall Islands Maritime Administrator. https://www.register-iri.com/wp-content/uploads/SSA-2022-05.pdf
  • Marshall Islands, BIMCO, ICC, IFSMA, INTERTANKO, INTERCARGO, & OCIMF. (2019). Standardized reporting of global piracy and armed robbery incidents. MSC 101/18/2, 1, 1–64.
  • Mccabe, R. C. (2018). Modern Maritime Piracy. Routledge.
  • Mejia, M. (2003). Maritime Gerrymandering: Dilemmas in Defining Piracy, Terrorism and other Acts of Maritime Violence. Journal of International Commercial Law, 2(2), 153–175.
  • Mitchell, V. (2020). Global challenges in maritime security: an introduction. In L. Otto (Ed.), Global Challenges in Maritime Security (pp. 111–126). Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2020.1809368
  • Mitchell, V. (2022). State Cooperation for Maritime Security in the Gulf of Guinea. Power and the Maritime Domain, 144–159. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003298984-13
  • Nguyen, L. N. (2018). The UNCLOS Dispute Settlement System: What Role Can It Play in Resolving Maritime Disputes in Asia? Asian Journal of International Law, 8(1), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1017/S204425131600031X
  • Okafor-Yarwood, I. (2020). The Cyclical Nature of Maritime Security Threats: Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated Fishing as a Threat to Human and National Security in the Gulf of Guinea. African Security, 13(2), 116–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392206.2020.1724432
  • Otto, L. (2020). Global challenges in maritime security: an introduction. In L. Otto (Ed.), Introducing Maritime Security: The Sea as a Geostrategic Space. In: Otto, L. (eds) Global Challenges in Maritime Security. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. (Issue 1, pp. 1–11). Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2020.1809368
  • Pulungan, R. W. (2021). Enhancing Maritime Security in the Malacca Strait: Cooperation Against Piracy and Maritime Terrorism. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol7.2.220
  • Rahman, C. (2009). Centre for Strategic Studies: New Zealand Concepts of Maritime Security A strategic perspective on alternative visions for good order and security at sea, with policy implications for New Zealand. The Centre for Strategic Studies: New Zealand, Discussion Papers, 07. http://www.vuw.ac.nz/css/
  • ReCAAP. (2020). Annual Report Piracy and Armed Robbery Against Ships in Asia 2019 (Issue December). https://www.rtda.gov.rw/fileadmin/templates/publications/RWANDA_Annual_Report_2018-2019_SHARING.pdf,
  • ReCAAP ISC. (2021). ReCAAP Annual Report 2021. In ReCAAP Annual Report 2021. https://www.rtda.gov.rw/fileadmin/templates/publications/RWANDA_Annual_Report_2018-2019_SHARING.pdf,
  • ReCAAP Webpage. (n.d.). About Us. ReCAAP Website. Retrieved November 8, 2022, from https://www.recaap.org/about_ReCAAP-ISC
  • Rosedi, S. R. M. (2013). THE ROLES OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE IN MERCHANT SHIPPING ’ S COMMUNICATION: THE TRAINING NEEDS OF DECK WATCHKEEPING OFFICERS THE ROLES OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE IN MERCHANT SHIPPING ’ S COMMUNICATION: THE TRAINING NEEDS OF DECK WATCHKEEPING OFFICERS Shamsul Rizal b. November.
  • Ryan, B. J. (2022). Maritime Security in a Critical Context 1. In Routledge Handbook of Maritime Security (pp. 27–37). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003001324-4
  • Shemella, P., Bogle, A., Chalk, P., Cline, L., Doorey, T., Gunaratna, R., Mockaitis, T., Petroni, J., Reinhardt, C., & Schoultz, R. (2016). Global Responses to Maritime Violence: Cooperation and Collective Action (P. Shemella (ed.)). Stanford Security Studies; Stanford University Press.
  • Sia, T., & Said, M. H. (2018). The Importance of Maritime English Proficiency in Others Marine Related Undergraduate Programs. January. https://doi.org/10.23977/msmi.2018.82633
  • Slaughter, A.-M., & Hale, T. (2011). International Relations, Principal Theories. In Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (2011th ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/e722
  • Tanaka, Y. (2012). The international law of the sea (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/03071844309419508
  • The Maritime Executive. (2015, June 10). Chronic Under-Reporting of Piracy. The Maritime Executive. https://maritime-executive.com/article/chronic-under-reporting-of-piracy
  • U.S. Department of Homeland Security. (2005). National Strategy for Maritime Security: Maritime Commerce Security Plan.
  • U.S. Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI). (2022). Worldwide Threat to Shipping (WTS) Report (Issues 05 Oct-02 Nov). extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.oni.navy.mil/Portals/12/Intel agencies/piracy/WTS/20221102 WTS.pdf?ver=JeY7xn-1Qnl_267n_KsEBg%3D%3D
  • UN General Assembly. (2008). Oceans and the Law of the Sea: Report of the Secretary-General A/63/63: Vol. A/63/63 (Issue March). extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N08/266/26/PDF/N0826626.pdf?OpenElement
  • UN Security Council. (2008). Security council. Resolution 1816. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300019251
  • United Kingdom Maritime Trade Organisation (UKMTO). (2022). UKMTO Quarterly Maritime Security Report - Q3 2022 - Jul-Sep.
  • United Nations. (1982). United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. In United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. https://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf
  • United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2020). Maritime Crime: a Manual for Criminal Justice Practitioners. https://www.unodc.org/documents/ropan/2021/GMCP_Maritime_3rd_edition_Ebook.pdf
  • Vestergaard Madsen, J., Seyle, C., Brandt, K., Purser, B., Randall, H., & Roy, K. (2013). The State of Maritime Piracy.
  • Walker, G. K., & Noyes, J. E. (2002). Law of the Sea Convention. California Western International Law Journal, 32(2), 343–386. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203553565